Page 4 of 6: businesses ranked 301-400 of 550. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.
All seven reviews give five stars. Work quality is consistent, staff (Tommy and Jenny named) arrive on time, and customers trust the business to be straight with them.
One five-star review offers limited detail but suggests straightforward service. KSB claims to offer air conditioning installation and broader mechanical work since 2008, with Level 3 BizSAFE certification.
Half the recent reviews rate Flash Aircon at five stars, praising polite staff and neat workmanship. The other half give one or two stars, citing repeated missed appointments, last-minute cancellations, and poor responsiveness to maintenance scheduling. Some customers report chasing the company for weeks without resolution, leading them to switch providers.
Most reviewers report fast, friendly service and reasonable prices, with several loyal customers over a decade. However, recent complaints cite aggressive quoting tactics during routine servicing and poor follow-up when problems arise post-visit.
Dcool's work stands out for straightforward pricing and staff who diagnose what your aircon actually needs rather than pushing unnecessary work. Reviewers consistently mention Danny, a technician who explains maintenance steps and settings clearly.
Two reviews offer limited insight. One praises completion of a complex job; the other criticises coordination with Mitsubishi over a faulty unit exchange and expresses frustration at repeated servicing in eight months.
Toyo Aircon divides sharply: half the reviews praise punctuality and thorough work, while the other half report chronic lateness, rushed service, and deteriorating quality. Recent complaints describe technicians breaking agreed appointment windows, cleaning in under 20 minutes that once took an hour, and staff who fail to keep promises (like assigning Japanese-speaking personnel). The business lists annual maintenance contracts starting at S$250 for two units, but several long-term customers felt shortchanged after years of loyal use.
Long-standing customers praise Noris for punctual quarterly servicing, honest quotes with no hidden charges, and clean installations. Technician Adrian and staff keep clients updated via WhatsApp. Recent complaints centre on incomplete free servicing, persistent gas top-up pressure despite prior refills, and lack of follow-up on pending appointments after weeks.
Most customers find Green City reliable and easy to reach via WhatsApp, with quick turnaround on repairs and reasonable rates. A few older complaints about delays and untidy work suggest checking recent reviews and confirming arrival times upfront.
Five-star reviews praise knowledgeable staff like Ah Lim, Karthik, and Thet for patient explanations and clean work. One-star complaints span years: technicians push chemical wash services aggressively, fail to complete repairs, miss appointments, and have breached paid contracts. The spread is extreme, suggesting inconsistent service quality or execution gaps.
All five reviews rate Duct Doctors at five stars. Customers praise staff by name (Chuan) for patient, knowledgeable guidance on duct mold and cleaning. They highlight fast response, honest quotes, free assessments, and visible results with video proof. One reviewer tried multiple contractors without success before getting their persistent mold problem solved here.
All five Google reviews are five-star. Repeat customers praise the repair work as neat and thorough, with clean practices throughout the visit. The business points to 20 years' experience.
All three reviewers praised HH Air-Conditioner Services for punctual, professional installation work and fair prices. Details remain limited.
Best work comes from technicians like Brendon and Nick, who diagnose honestly and explain problems before charging. Reliability is the core issue: multiple customers report no-shows despite confirmed bookings, missed follow-ups lasting weeks, and repair quotes only revealed after work is done. Pricing complaints run deep-one customer paid $500 for a $200 job-and responses to concerns are dismissive.
One five-star review praised reliable installation work. A recent one-star complaint centres on irresponsible company vehicle parking in residential areas, blocking residents and the road. Evidence is limited with only two reviews spanning four years.
All eight reviews rate five stars. Customers praise fast response times, honest diagnostics that avoid unnecessary work, and thorough cleaning. Staff solve problems on the day they're called and explain issues clearly. Installation and regular maintenance work earns specific mention for tidiness and attention to detail.
All four reviews are five-star. Reviewers praise Kenny and Eddie for dedicated, professional work on both residential and office aircon. No complaints noted in available reviews.
Half the reviews are five-star accounts of careful installation work and reasonable pricing. The other half cite repeated no-shows, slow replies, and messy finishing-with one reviewer describing wall patches and skipped sealing work they had to fix themselves. Staff named include Anthony and Kevin Lee.
When the team arrives, they deliver solid technical work and treat your home with care. Phone interactions and reliability are weaker: staff rudeness, missed appointments, ghosting after service, and unresolved cooling problems sour the experience. Inconsistency marks this business.
Both reviewers praise punctuality, professionalism, and fair pricing. Staff diagnosed issues quickly and explained work clearly; one customer used them for both home and business.
Both available reviews praise quick response and low prices. Limited evidence from two reviews, but they back the business's claim of competitive rates and reliable servicing across Singapore.
Most customers come back repeatedly and praise thorough cleaning and professional service. One reviewer flagged concerns about honest assessment, though acknowledged quick responses.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Most reviews praise quick scheduling, thorough work, and fair pricing on servicing and chemical cleaning. One older complaint noted unresponsiveness to an inquiry; recent feedback is solidly positive.
Five-star reviews across seven ratings highlight professional work at reasonable prices. Limited recent review detail available, though praise points to skilled staff and straightforward charges.
Five-star reviews highlight thorough work: technicians disassemble and wash blowers, clean ducts included, and visible results. One-star reviews flag late arrivals (up to an hour), poor staff communication, and past repairs that failed within a month. The service splits sharply between satisfied repeat customers and those who experienced delays or follow-up issues.
Most customers experience fast responses and on-time service visits at competitive rates. One older complaint involved an inspection charge without follow-up repair and unanswered calls, though the bulk of feedback praises their reliability and friendliness over multiple years.
Long-standing customers praise Takai Yama for professional work, responsive service, and genuine trustworthiness. One aged complaint suggests occasional gaps in what service covers.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Opinions split sharply: many report fast, clean installation and reliable maintenance when service runs smoothly, with staff named for responsiveness. Others describe poor follow-up on enquiries, services performed without consent, and difficulty rescheduling missed visits. Staff conduct on-site (politeness, tidiness) draws consistent praise; management coordination does not.
All three available Google reviews award five stars. Detail on specific work or staff is limited, so praise is broad rather than grounded in concrete experience.
All three reviews are five-star. One mentions strong value and reliable after-sales care, suggesting dependable maintenance at fair prices.
Most jobs finish on time with staff that answer quickly and treat customers politely. One install went rough: damaged floor tiles, incomplete cleaning of parts, and delays waiting for gas top-up. Most reviewers report the work holds and recommend the service.
Most reviewers report poor customer service, missed appointments, and installation problems. One reviewer's new aircon unit failed to cool and staff could not fix it; follow-up checks revealed the bracket was installed carelessly. A few earlier reviews praise polite maintenance staff and clean work, but recent complaints dominate.
Half the reviews praise skilled technicians, fair prices, and clean installations that last years. The other half report boundary-crossing (using residents' belongings), inconsistent professionalism, and damage or health concerns after visits. Recent five-star feedback (past year) often mentions named staff; older complaints raise credibility issues.
Older reviews praise quick, courteous work, but a recent complaint flags pushy extras and incomplete cleaning. Detail is limited across just three reviews.
Five-star reviews spanning a decade show steady trust. Lucius appears by name as the go-to technician. Customers cite responsiveness, reliability across homes and workplaces, and value-for-money pricing.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Reviewers across multiple years praise clear communication, attentive technicians who explain maintenance options, and clean, considerate work. Evidence is limited to older reviews; current performance cannot be fully assessed.
Ah Heng, their technician, impressed a customer with skill and reliability even during difficult weather. Limited review data makes broader assessment difficult.
Most recent reviews praise prompt contact and service quality, though an older complaint about a no-show without notification stands out. Limited review detail overall.
All four reviews rate Zoom Hands five stars, citing trustworthiness, professional service, and reliability. Evidence is limited to brief praise with no detail on specific services, pricing, or wait times.
Older reviews praise Sky Breeze for reliability and straightforward pricing, but recent complaints highlight gaps: missed services, unresponsive management, and inconsistent technician care. Evidence on current service quality is limited and mixed.
Strong spots and serious gaps mix here. A long-term customer praised their ability to fix old units and diagnose complex wiring faults, while another reported Ah Wei quickly found and corrected a cross-wiring installation error. Yet installation defects dominate complaints: one household endured repeated water flooding for months after a new install with no fix; another paid over $500 for outdoor cleaning and refrigerant top-up without proper pressure measurement, leaving units still inadequately cold; a third saw an undiagnosed gas leak cost over $100 with no real resolution.
One reviewer praised straightforward diagnostics and fair quotes, contrasting the technician's honesty against pushier competitors.
Two reviews average 4 stars. Detail is limited without review text, but the rating reflects solid customer experience. ebm-papst SEA supplies and installs specialty fans and controllers across Southeast Asia.
One five-star review from four years ago praises the business for affordable and trusted air conditioning work, though limited recent feedback means the current service picture is unclear.
Many reviewers praise the team for quick, clean work and reasonable rates. Several five-star jobs show excellent installation and chemical cleaning results. However, a cluster of one-star reviews from the same period flags serious gaps: technicians quoting prices without itemization, charging for work that did not solve the problem, and brushing off follow-up questions. The company appears capable on good days but inconsistent in communication and accountability.
Limited review evidence, but both five-star ratings praise solid work at reasonable cost.
One five-star review credits Supreme Air Services with an aircon system still running reliably after five years, suggesting durability and stable performance. Limited review evidence, but the customer's consideration of upgrading to a higher system indicates satisfaction with the install quality.
One five-star review on file. Towa Marine operates across marine and industrial cooling systems with 30+ years in business, though direct customer insight is limited.
One recent reviewer reported paying $340 for eight units serviced with only filter washing and vacuuming, roughly double what competitors charge, and a unit began leaking water that damaged flooring. An older five-star review praised workmanship and trustworthiness, but the limited and polarised feedback makes this hard to assess.
A polarized track record: long-term clients praise punctual service and reasonable maintenance packages, but the majority of reviewers report chronic leaks and poor installation workmanship. Pipe connections and gas fittings are frequently identified as sources of recurring problems; several customers say D.I.S. delayed repairs past the warranty period, then charged for fixes. Damage during installation, no-shows, and unresponsive follow-up are documented. One customer pursued small claims court action over repair costs. A few clients with positive experiences cite competent technicians (Aris, Mike, A Hua) and clean workmanship, but these accounts are far outnumbered by complaints of shoddy piping, failed troubleshooting, and poor after-sales communication.
Array Engineering offers aircon installation across Singapore. Review evidence is limited to a single brief comment, so detailed service breakdown is not possible.
One early review reports a generally happy experience with Airconpros despite encountering some initial problems that were resolved.
One five-star review on file; limited evidence to assess service quality or consistency.
Most customers report high-pressure sales tactics, inflated charges for unnecessary services, and poor workmanship that leaves problems unresolved. Staff frequently suggest expensive deep cleaning or parts replacement without justification, offer conflicting quotes, and ignore follow-up requests when issues persist after service.
Three reviewers over a decade ago reported fast leak repairs, fair quotes without upselling, and follow-up service kept as promised. Limited recent evidence.
Both reviewers reported smooth, professional jobs with staff who explained issues clearly and went beyond the job scope. One job involved industrial building prep with diagnostic work and compressor cleaning; the other was straightforward installation.
Most customers experience fast, affordable service with knowledgeable technicians who deliver visible cooling improvements. One reviewer flagged invoice errors and slow admin response, though the technician's hands-on work was praised.
Two reviewers praised thorough servicing and honest guidance on unnecessary work; two others reported serious issues: unresolved problems after servicing went unanswered, a loose wire reconnection was blamed on parts failure, and charges exceeded quoted rates. Evidence is limited but sentiment is sharply divided.
One five-star review from six years ago reports friendly staff and good service, though review volume is minimal. Pricing is transparent and published on the website for servicing and chemical overhauls across different unit counts.
Both reviewers praised detailed installation work that goes beyond surface-level service, combined with fair pricing and approachable staff. Evidence is limited to two five-star reviews from three years ago.
Recent customers praise swift WhatsApp replies and practical help with old unit removal and new condenser placement. Older reviews report silent treatment on calls and quotes that seemed high compared to competitors in the same area.
Alfred earned strong praise for his technical know-how and the business's cleaning work. Evidence is thin: only two five-star reviews, but both speak to competent hands-on service.
Recent five-star reviews highlight responsive technicians, clean installations, and fair pricing. However, older reviews document a pattern of missed appointments, staff rudeness, and service inconsistencies. Response times and communication remain common concerns, though the business appears responsive on recent jobs.
One 5-star review praises quick responses and fair rates. A 1-star review flags recurring water leaks within months of repair, unresponsiveness to callbacks, and eventual silence from the business. Evidence is thin: only 4 reviews across 7 years.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Two recent reviews document troubling experiences: aggressive upselling from a $50 promotion to $500, followed by silence when the work failed and units leaked water. A second reviewer noted the technician left equipment panels and doors open after rejecting additional paid services. Evidence is limited and concerning.
Single five-star review supports the business's claims. Evidence is limited: no detailed review text available to assess workmanship, responsiveness, or reliability in practice. Pricing and credentials are published transparently online.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Two installations ran on schedule with friendly, skilled technicians. Pricing felt fair and transparent. One job suffered a post-install water leak; follow-up took 13 days and warranty card process was confusing. Sales staff located overseas, product knowledge gaps emerged. Evidence is limited to three reviews over four years.
One caller praised the technician's knowledge and punctuality for a PBC board replacement. Another reported the office staff seemed unaware the business handled air conditioning, raising questions about consistency.
Limited review evidence: one five-star rating on Google. Their website lists maintenance contracts from $215 for three units yearly, plus one-time servicing from $25 to $43.60 per unit, with chemical wash and gas top-up also available. They serve most of Singapore.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One reviewer praised a technician for expertise and service. Another reported a unit failed within a month after installation, then faced denial of warranty and demands for additional payment, with complaints about quoted prices changing later.
Most reviewers report rude treatment from office staff and declining technical quality. Installations leak, serviced units malfunction the same day, and the company refuses accountability. One long-term customer of 15 years left citing incompetent technicians replacing skilled ones. A small number praise honest diagnostics, but problems with follow-up and site damage (chipped walls, stains) go unapologized.
Older reviews praise professional service and thorough work, but a recent one-star experience documents a failed second appointment with no response for hours and inadequate chemical washing that moulded within five months, contradicting the company's own earlier receipt.
Mechstar responds quickly to requests and delivers solid installation work, particularly for HDB and condo units. Customers report fair pricing and genuine follow-up help with minor issues after the job is done, though limited feedback overall.
Review evidence is limited: one recent one-star complaint about unresponsiveness and one five-star mention offer little texture. The business's website lists IAQ auditing, duct cleaning, and AHU disinfection services, but customer experience detail is sparse.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
One five-star review supports the rating, but detail is limited. The business operates in commercial and industrial air conditioning alongside broader distribution services.
Review evidence is limited: two one-star complaints span three years and detail pricing confusion and a damage dispute the business disputed. The business's website offers servicing and installation across Singapore's regions, but recent customer experience details are sparse.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Two positive jobs done on time at fair prices. One severe installation failure led to a breakdown in communication: the boss became hostile when asked to fix the fault, and the company could not locate invoice records.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Limited review evidence: a split 3-star average from 2 ratings shows mixed experience. Their website lists maintenance contracts, chemical wash, and gas top-up services, with promotional pricing ($25–$215 for contracts and multi-unit jobs). Without detailed review text, the specific reasons for the rating spread cannot be determined.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Strong service and fair rates win regular clients, but repeated complaints about high-pressure tactics-especially targeting renters with threatened contract breaches-and contract reinterpretation after payment mark a troubling pattern. Service quality is uneven: some technicians solve problems well, others lack knowledge or cause damage.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
A-Class Aircon Management shows split sentiment: two reviewers praise a named technician and years of consistent service, but three others report dangerous driving by company drivers and poor servicing that caused units to leak within a month. Scheduling is fast, but quality control appears weak.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Last updated 2026-09-15