Page 3 of 3: businesses ranked 201-261 of 261. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.
Half the recent reviews rate Flash Aircon at five stars, praising polite staff and neat workmanship. The other half give one or two stars, citing repeated missed appointments, last-minute cancellations, and poor responsiveness to maintenance scheduling. Some customers report chasing the company for weeks without resolution, leading them to switch providers.
Most reviewers report fast, friendly service and reasonable prices, with several loyal customers over a decade. However, recent complaints cite aggressive quoting tactics during routine servicing and poor follow-up when problems arise post-visit.
Two reviews offer limited insight. One praises completion of a complex job; the other criticises coordination with Mitsubishi over a faulty unit exchange and expresses frustration at repeated servicing in eight months.
Toyo Aircon divides sharply: half the reviews praise punctuality and thorough work, while the other half report chronic lateness, rushed service, and deteriorating quality. Recent complaints describe technicians breaking agreed appointment windows, cleaning in under 20 minutes that once took an hour, and staff who fail to keep promises (like assigning Japanese-speaking personnel). The business lists annual maintenance contracts starting at S$250 for two units, but several long-term customers felt shortchanged after years of loyal use.
Long-standing customers praise Noris for punctual quarterly servicing, honest quotes with no hidden charges, and clean installations. Technician Adrian and staff keep clients updated via WhatsApp. Recent complaints centre on incomplete free servicing, persistent gas top-up pressure despite prior refills, and lack of follow-up on pending appointments after weeks.
Most customers find Green City reliable and easy to reach via WhatsApp, with quick turnaround on repairs and reasonable rates. A few older complaints about delays and untidy work suggest checking recent reviews and confirming arrival times upfront.
Best work comes from technicians like Brendon and Nick, who diagnose honestly and explain problems before charging. Reliability is the core issue: multiple customers report no-shows despite confirmed bookings, missed follow-ups lasting weeks, and repair quotes only revealed after work is done. Pricing complaints run deep-one customer paid $500 for a $200 job-and responses to concerns are dismissive.
All eight reviews rate five stars. Customers praise fast response times, honest diagnostics that avoid unnecessary work, and thorough cleaning. Staff solve problems on the day they're called and explain issues clearly. Installation and regular maintenance work earns specific mention for tidiness and attention to detail.
Most customers come back repeatedly and praise thorough cleaning and professional service. One reviewer flagged concerns about honest assessment, though acknowledged quick responses.
Most reviews praise quick scheduling, thorough work, and fair pricing on servicing and chemical cleaning. One older complaint noted unresponsiveness to an inquiry; recent feedback is solidly positive.
Five-star reviews across seven ratings highlight professional work at reasonable prices. Limited recent review detail available, though praise points to skilled staff and straightforward charges.
Five-star reviews highlight thorough work: technicians disassemble and wash blowers, clean ducts included, and visible results. One-star reviews flag late arrivals (up to an hour), poor staff communication, and past repairs that failed within a month. The service splits sharply between satisfied repeat customers and those who experienced delays or follow-up issues.
Long-standing customers praise Takai Yama for professional work, responsive service, and genuine trustworthiness. One aged complaint suggests occasional gaps in what service covers.
Opinions split sharply: many report fast, clean installation and reliable maintenance when service runs smoothly, with staff named for responsiveness. Others describe poor follow-up on enquiries, services performed without consent, and difficulty rescheduling missed visits. Staff conduct on-site (politeness, tidiness) draws consistent praise; management coordination does not.
All three reviews are five-star. One mentions strong value and reliable after-sales care, suggesting dependable maintenance at fair prices.
Most jobs finish on time with staff that answer quickly and treat customers politely. One install went rough: damaged floor tiles, incomplete cleaning of parts, and delays waiting for gas top-up. Most reviewers report the work holds and recommend the service.
Ah Heng, their technician, impressed a customer with skill and reliability even during difficult weather. Limited review data makes broader assessment difficult.
Most recent reviews praise prompt contact and service quality, though an older complaint about a no-show without notification stands out. Limited review detail overall.
All four reviews rate Zoom Hands five stars, citing trustworthiness, professional service, and reliability. Evidence is limited to brief praise with no detail on specific services, pricing, or wait times.
Older reviews praise Sky Breeze for reliability and straightforward pricing, but recent complaints highlight gaps: missed services, unresponsive management, and inconsistent technician care. Evidence on current service quality is limited and mixed.
Seven years of five-star reviews show staff who answered calls at 1am and charged fairly for chemical cleans and blower servicing. A recent one-star complaint cites no replies for over a week and refusal to diagnose a fault, suggesting service has deteriorated or become inconsistent.
All three reviews praise LM3 Aircon for honest pricing, reliability, and thorough work. Limited evidence available: no complaints logged, and only three 5-star reviews across six years.
Many reviewers praise the team for quick, clean work and reasonable rates. Several five-star jobs show excellent installation and chemical cleaning results. However, a cluster of one-star reviews from the same period flags serious gaps: technicians quoting prices without itemization, charging for work that did not solve the problem, and brushing off follow-up questions. The company appears capable on good days but inconsistent in communication and accountability.
One recent reviewer reported paying $340 for eight units serviced with only filter washing and vacuuming, roughly double what competitors charge, and a unit began leaking water that damaged flooring. An older five-star review praised workmanship and trustworthiness, but the limited and polarised feedback makes this hard to assess.
A polarized track record: long-term clients praise punctual service and reasonable maintenance packages, but the majority of reviewers report chronic leaks and poor installation workmanship. Pipe connections and gas fittings are frequently identified as sources of recurring problems; several customers say D.I.S. delayed repairs past the warranty period, then charged for fixes. Damage during installation, no-shows, and unresponsive follow-up are documented. One customer pursued small claims court action over repair costs. A few clients with positive experiences cite competent technicians (Aris, Mike, A Hua) and clean workmanship, but these accounts are far outnumbered by complaints of shoddy piping, failed troubleshooting, and poor after-sales communication.
Three reviewers over a decade ago reported fast leak repairs, fair quotes without upselling, and follow-up service kept as promised. Limited recent evidence.
Two five-star reviews from six years ago consistently praise AL Aircon for quick responsiveness, transparent pricing, and detailed explanations of work. Detail on recent performance is limited.
One five-star review from six years ago reports friendly staff and good service, though review volume is minimal. Pricing is transparent and published on the website for servicing and chemical overhauls across different unit counts.
Alfred earned strong praise for his technical know-how and the business's cleaning work. Evidence is thin: only two five-star reviews, but both speak to competent hands-on service.
Recent five-star reviews highlight responsive technicians, clean installations, and fair pricing. However, older reviews document a pattern of missed appointments, staff rudeness, and service inconsistencies. Response times and communication remain common concerns, though the business appears responsive on recent jobs.
One 5-star review praises quick responses and fair rates. A 1-star review flags recurring water leaks within months of repair, unresponsiveness to callbacks, and eventual silence from the business. Evidence is thin: only 4 reviews across 7 years.
One caller praised the technician's knowledge and punctuality for a PBC board replacement. Another reported the office staff seemed unaware the business handled air conditioning, raising questions about consistency.
Limited review evidence: one five-star rating on Google. Their website lists maintenance contracts from $215 for three units yearly, plus one-time servicing from $25 to $43.60 per unit, with chemical wash and gas top-up also available. They serve most of Singapore.
Most reviewers report rude treatment from office staff and declining technical quality. Installations leak, serviced units malfunction the same day, and the company refuses accountability. One long-term customer of 15 years left citing incompetent technicians replacing skilled ones. A small number praise honest diagnostics, but problems with follow-up and site damage (chipped walls, stains) go unapologized.
Older reviews praise professional service and thorough work, but a recent one-star experience documents a failed second appointment with no response for hours and inadequate chemical washing that moulded within five months, contradicting the company's own earlier receipt.
Mechstar responds quickly to requests and delivers solid installation work, particularly for HDB and condo units. Customers report fair pricing and genuine follow-up help with minor issues after the job is done, though limited feedback overall.
Review evidence is limited: one recent one-star complaint about unresponsiveness and one five-star mention offer little texture. The business's website lists IAQ auditing, duct cleaning, and AHU disinfection services, but customer experience detail is sparse.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
All four reviews rate this Kovan-based service five stars. Customers praise fair pricing, honest work, and technician Alvin's skill and willingness to fit emergency repairs despite his schedule. No complaints surface in the available record.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Limited review evidence: a split 3-star average from 2 ratings shows mixed experience. Their website lists maintenance contracts, chemical wash, and gas top-up services, with promotional pricing ($25–$215 for contracts and multi-unit jobs). Without detailed review text, the specific reasons for the rating spread cannot be determined.
Strong service and fair rates win regular clients, but repeated complaints about high-pressure tactics-especially targeting renters with threatened contract breaches-and contract reinterpretation after payment mark a troubling pattern. Service quality is uneven: some technicians solve problems well, others lack knowledge or cause damage.
A-Class Aircon Management shows split sentiment: two reviewers praise a named technician and years of consistent service, but three others report dangerous driving by company drivers and poor servicing that caused units to leak within a month. Scheduling is fast, but quality control appears weak.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Five of six reviews are one-star complaints spanning over a decade, alleging overcharging, poor follow-up on leaking units post-installation, and upselling of unnecessary work. One four-star review from 2012 stands alone. Evidence for the service tier is thin and overwhelmingly negative.
Aircon Service, Chemical Wash & Overhaul operates in Yishun with published rates for normal servicing and chemical wash work. No individual review text is available, so assessment is limited to their stated service offerings and pricing structure.
Most recent reviewers report failed troubleshooting, mysterious charges for services not rendered, and staff who dismiss legitimate complaints. Two older positive reviews credit reliable past service, yet eight one-star accounts spanning years describe unresolved problems, evasiveness, and inflated costs. The 1.8 rating reflects a consistent pattern of service falling short.
Review evidence is limited. Global Advanced Tech Enterprise is based in Ang Mo Kio and offers air conditioning installation, maintenance contracts, and related services across Singapore, including testing, commissioning, and ventilation work.
No individual reviews are available to assess customer experience or service quality. The business publishes detailed pricing for common jobs (general service from $25 per unit; chemical wash from $60 per unit) and claims 15+ years of operation with certifications in aircon installation.
Review evidence is limited; no customer feedback available. Winsteam Engineering & Construction lists emergency ACMV services among a wide range of MEP work. Their website claims BCA and SCDF compliance, ISO-aligned processes, and operation since 1994.
Review evidence is limited. The business lists installation, servicing, maintenance, and chemical overhaul on its website, with islandwide coverage and prices starting at $1,188 for a Daikin system. Concrete customer feedback is not available to assess reliability or workmanship.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
No detailed reviews are available for this business. It is registered as a Google-verified service provider offering installation, maintenance, repair, and emergency aircon work across Singapore. Pricing and service options are published on their website; prospective customers should contact them directly to confirm availability and current rates.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review detail is limited: no customer feedback text is available to assess their installation quality, response times, or reliability. Their website publishes fixed pricing for servicing and chemical work, with surcharges for evening, weekend, and CBD visits.
Review evidence is limited. The business lists maintenance and contracting services for Singapore. Their website states they serve the full island, but specific feedback on their work is not available from the inputs provided.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Last updated 2026-09-15